Dec 162010
 
Policy items accomplished?  Sure, and many of them.  What has been left behind, however, is inexcusable.

Policy items accomplished? Sure, and many of them. What has been left behind, however, is inexcusable.

In the still-infant months of the Obama administration, April of 2009, the shine of hope and promise that was ushered in during the previous campaign began to see its first blemishes.  While there was the embracing of releasing Bush-era memos detailing exactly how and when captives held by the United States could be tortured, and under what legal framework would be created to protect said behavior, any hope for actual justice for such heinous acts carried out in the name of the United States were quickly snuffed from existence.

Obama stated, back then, that CIA agents right on up to members of the Bush administration would not face prosecution for orchestrating, implementing, and justifying systematic torture of prisoners.  Not now, and in theory not ever.

Within days, the enormous amount of power that was diverted to the Executive Branch during the Bush administration via the AT&T-led warrant-less wiretapping program also found a new voice of support stemming from the Obama administration.  There would be no investigation of high-level Bush administration officials that pushed for the surveillance and there would be no investigation of the American companies that took part in the American government-sponsored spying on American citizens of every walk of life.

The reaction from the vast and general public was a collective shrug of the shoulder.  The President took shelter behind approval ratings in the mid 60′s and continued to ride out the storm.  Nearly two years later, the government can also now take nearly-nude photographs of you and feel you up – for your safety, of course.

Thus highlighted what would become an extremely depressing and long line of Very Important Things that the President would either ignore, capitulate on, reverse course, and – as much as the cheesiness of the phrase makes me cringe – flip flop on.

Continue reading »

Dec 032010
 
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales faces a protest in 2007

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales faces a protest in 2007

In the early days of the Obama Administration – March of 2009 – a human rights group in Spain named Association for the Dignity of Spanish Prisoners made an appeal to Spain’s National Court that the body use its ability to protect the rights of Spanish citizens no matter where they may be by targeting the United States and it’s creation of “a legal framework that allegedly permitted torture”.  Charges were brought against a who’s-who list of the legal accomplices to the pro-torture policy of the Bush Administration:

  • Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
  • Chief of staff/legal adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, David Addington
  • Pentagon general counsel William Haynes
  • Undersecretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith
  • Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel, Jay Bybee
  • Official in the Office of Legal Counsel, John Yoo

Between these men, you had the sources for policies that reigned for most of the opening decade of this century when it came to America’s outward appearance to the rest of the world.  From these men you saw the legal framework and backing for the undoing of decades of goodwill that the United States made and gained throughout the 20th century.  From these men you saw the legal justification for a superpower – and by extension anyone else if they so chose – to abandon things like the Geneva Convention.

The Obama Administration had a rather important decision to make.

Continue reading »

Mar 232008
 

Now official…

AP via MSNBC: BAGHDAD – A roadside bomb killed four U.S. soldiers in Baghdad on Sunday, the military said, pushing the overall American death toll in the five-year war to at least 4,000.

The grim milestone came on the same day that rockets and mortars pounded the U.S.-protected Green Zone, underscoring the fragile security situation and the resilience of both Sunni and Shiite extremist groups despite an overall lull in violence.

Continue reading »

Jan 182008
 

Iran, Syria, China: three countries that probably don’t bring out the best of thoughts in Americans’ minds. Leave China out and you have your typical freedom-hating Arabs. Add China in and you have your run of the mill America-hating countries. Add the United States to that list and you have a list of countries that normally wouldn’t appear next to each other regarding much of anything at all. Safe to say if the United States has something in common with Iran, Syria, and China, it’s not going to be a good thing.

Continue reading »

Aug 072007
 

110,000 AK-47 rifles, 80,000 pistols, and 250,000 pieces of body armor and helmets have been supplied to one of the enemies fighting and killing American troops in Iraq. We know that the enemy, the insurgents in Iraq, took delivery of the weapons in 2005 according to new reports that have surfaced this week. No doubt the political tension between Washington and the government responsible for supplying these weapons to the insurgents has been increasing, and may soon reach a boiling point that could result in the widening of this conflict beyond the borders of Iraq.

President Bush today was even on the offensive on the situation:

“It’s up to Iran to prove to the world that they’re a stabilizing force as opposed to a destabilizing force. After all, this is a government that has proclaimed its desire to build a nuclear weapon,” he said during a joint press conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

So we have the saber rattling, we have the proof, when do we start the bombing?

There’s only one minor road block to get around first. Those 110,000 AK-47 rifles, 80,000 pistols, and 250,000 pieces of body armor and helmets were not exactly shipped in crates saying “From Tehran, with love!” Instead, this large shipment of needed weapons to fuel the insurgency in Iraq was shipped from none other than the United States of America.

Continue reading »

Aug 062007
 

The Dog Days of Summer have come to the nation’s capital. The politicians have fled town – and who could blame them? I know of a dozen better places to spend my time than in the middle of a former swamp during that time of year where you can take a knife to the air and cut yourself a drink of water. Then again, I’m not one of the 535 people charged with representing a sect of people in the United States. I don’t have a job to do in D.C.

It began Friday evening. It always begins on Friday evenings. Why do the worst things that happen in this country in a government-related sense begin, or are announced, on Friday evenings? Anyway, breaking news bulletins crossed the television, announcing that negotiations between the Senate and the White House on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Back when the act came into effect in 1978, though controversial it was intended to be a legal means to spy on foreign intelligence working in this country. It was one of the laws warped by 2001′s USA PATRIOT Act to include that wide blanket group of “terrorists” and their sympathizers, which depending on who’s running what, can include people from actual legitimate terrorist organizations, to someone on the street wearing a “Buck Fush” t-shirt.

The negotiations taking place between the Senate and the White House seemed to center around the usage of illegal wiretaps against American citizens – something which the NSA and AT&T have turned into an art form over the past decade in their efficiency and scope of recording powers. There was a glimmer of hope earlier on that Friday evening that perhaps tonight was the night we would see the Congress stand up for the vast majority of Americans who are sick and tired of this administration, and this administration abusing its authority with regularity. I was one of the people hoping.
Continue reading »

Jul 022007
 

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

It’s a simple line that introduces each and every president to their new term in office. It’s something that has been passed down from President to President and generation to generation. By no means will each and every President adhere to that line through and through, but the general idea is that the President will do their best – the best of their ability – to live up to that phrase. It may only be one line, but it is one line suggesting the defense of both this country as well as the laws which make it such a great place to be in human history. If a President can not adhere to that one simple line, that one simple oath, logically speaking that President does not deserve to hold that position of power any more.

Not so subtly, that brings us to our current President, our President for another year and a half, George W. Bush. To say he hasn’t lived up to that simple oath would be a bit of a stretch. To say he has burned it right along with the integrity of this country and the laws upon which it was founded would be a bit more in adherence with fact. Presidents have lied. They’ve lied about wars. They’ve lied about how they conduct policy foreign and domestic. Presidents have done things to undermine portions of this country and its Constitution, but never before in our 231 year history has a single President done so much across the board in every possible aspect of the office itself to completely undermine, destroy, and make an outright mockery of this country and everything it stands for.
Continue reading »

Jun 072007
 

In the early part of this decade, newly appointed/elected president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, and his newly elected American counterpart, George W. Bush, seemed to reach out toward each other in a common desire for peace and good feelings. It turns out that perhaps Mr. Putin should have left the meetings with a complementary “I talked with George Bush and all I got was ‘Pooty Poot’ for a lousy nickname… and this shirt.” In yet another of a very long list of problems that it seems everyone of a vague intellect could have seen coming except for people in power in Washington, there is suddenly drama building once more between our capital and Moscow. As in the Cold War past, the issue deals with nuclear weapons, where they are being stationed, where they are being aimed, and exactly why they are being aimed there.

As far as I am concerned, if any country this decade wants to pick a bone with the United States they get a bit of a free pass. Let’s admit it – the U.S. has been just a tad aggressive this decade. The international political climate is at any point in time at best a dormant hornets’ nest, and the U.S. has done as best of a job as possible when it comes to taking a baseball bat and smacking that nest as often as possible. Until recently the most obvious effect of this action was rising tension with Iran, and to some extent China. Russia, however, has made a sudden leap forward and right back onto the map of countries that aren’t exactly thrilled with how America is conducting itself.

Continue reading »

May 252007
 

That last little outburst of mine was not exactly the most eloquent I have ever been in terms of this blog or talking about politics in general. It summed up my feelings and the feelings of many on my side of the political spectrum nicely though, if I do say so myself. The Base is burning, seething, and the American public is rolling their collective eyes. So much for the hype and the hope – meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Officially, as of this writing, 3,434 U.S. servicemen and women have laid down their lives in the sand trap that is Iraq. Some 26,188 have been wounded. Both numbers are sure to rise as soldiers die at the rate of almost 4 per day, 12 per day wounded. That has nothing to do with the number of Iraqis who have been killed, wounded, or forced to flee ever increasing violence in their homeland. At last check that number was heading closer and closer to 20% of the population. Any sane analysis of the situation on the ground will point to the fact that no matter what goals we had hoped to accomplish in this wild goose chase, we have failed and failed miserably. And by we, I mean those telling the troops who to shoot at, not the troops actually doing the shooting. Such episodes in American military morality as Haditha and Abu Ghraib don’t help that position along much, of course.

In a way, the vote to continue funding this disastrous sand box tour hurts more now than it would if this was before November 2006 and the Republicans were still in control. In fact, this hurts in every way possible more than it would have otherwise. It goes to show that this campaign to build a better party is far, far from being over. There’s still a lot of dead weight left hanging around here – there’s still a hell of a lot of career politicians out there who did nothing more but tap into the popularist wave that elected Democrats back to a majority in Congress for the first time in years only six months ago. They’re politicians; of course they are going to take advantage of these sorts of things. If you use 2006 as a starting point for this new grassroots effort, the collective we still only has 31 representatives in the House and 5 new Senators. The leadership of the party is currently made up by those from before 2006 – way before, in fact, still coming from a time where Democrats were willingly slapped around by the Republican Party from 1994 – 2005ish.

In these battered minds lies a highly distorted version of truth, facts, and opinion. In these battered minds, they care more of what people think of them than what they think their selves. If they can keep off of opposition talking points and make it harder for attacks to be launched against them, they have done their job and they are okay to “fight” another day. That’s heartwarming and all, but in this congressional fight, it just so happens to deal with actual human lives – human lives that will undoubtedly come to an end because of their lack of a backbone.
Continue reading »

May 012007
 

Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country.
- President George W. Bush; May 1st, 2003.

Thousands of our own kids never came home from Iraq. At the rate we’re going, thousands more won’t.
Continue reading »